Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:20:11 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH UPDATED 03/26] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() initmem_init() |
| |
* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> initmem_init() extensively accesses and modifies global data > structures and the parameters aren't even followed depending on which > path is being used. Drop @start/last_pfn and let it deal with > @max_pfn directly. This is in preparation for further NUMA init > cleanups. > > * x86-32 initmem_init() weren't updated breaking 32bit builds. Fixed. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> > Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> > Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> > Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> > Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com> > Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
You forgot to add:
Reported-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
The kernel development process is review and testing limited and we have a clear oversupply in development power. So we want to encourage review and testing feedback as much as possible, so adding all the Reported-by / Tested-by tags is absolutely vital to being able to do more development.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |