Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:28:16 +0200 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6] kvm: make vcpu life cycle separated from kvm instance |
| |
On 12/28/2011 12:19 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: >> Oops, that's only needed when the unplug API is introduced. >> > > > I think it is OK to to add such an API later on, but I really want > the author to write the plan in the changelog.
It was in fact in the beginning of the thread.
> I am not objecting to this patch itself, but the way this kind of change > is being introduced seems not be in a good manner.
It should be part of a patch series that adds the API, otherwise it will never be tested.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
| |