Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:25:45 -0700 | From | David Ahern <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/6] perf: add ability to record event period |
| |
On 12/19/2011 01:58 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > I get that Arun is in agreement, everything seems OK, but we need to do > a better job on describing why we add code, the context we have now from > all these discussions will be mostly lost, say, 5 years from now when we > try to figure out why something was done in some way,
It seems like an option is needed for all the sample attributes. Timestamp is now covered (-T). Sample address is covered (-d). Callchain (-g). This targets period (-P). I think that just leaves CPU, and we are out of c/C options. ;-)
David
| |