Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:08:41 -0500 | From | "John W. Linville" <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14 (phy vs. bcma) |
| |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:01:37PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 12/13/2011 11:26 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20111213: > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `b43_nphy_pmu_spur_avoid.clone.8': > phy_n.c:(.text+0x1589d8): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write' > phy_n.c:(.text+0x1589e9): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write' > phy_n.c:(.text+0x1589fa): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write' > phy_n.c:(.text+0x158a08): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write' > phy_n.c:(.text+0x158a1d): undefined reference to `bcma_chipco_pll_write' > drivers/built-in.o:phy_n.c:(.text+0x158a2e): more undefined references to `bcma_chipco_pll_write' follow > > > BCMA is not enabled. > Full randconfig file is attached.
I've already merged a patch to address this.
Thanks,
John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
| |