Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:27:46 -0600 | From | Rob Landley <> | Subject | Re: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1. |
| |
On 12/14/2011 01:13 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:55:16 +0300 > >>> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation. >>> >>> The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore' >>> but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit >>> symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> >> >> Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> >> >> Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks! > > Thanks for testing Sergei. >
Is that the line we're using now? I'm out of touch...
Tested-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Rob
| |