lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.
On 12/14/2011 01:13 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:55:16 +0300
>
>>> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
>>>
>>> The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
>>> but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
>>> symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>>
>> Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
>>
>> Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks!
>
> Thanks for testing Sergei.
>

Is that the line we're using now? I'm out of touch...

Tested-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>

Rob


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-14 20:31    [W:1.428 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site