lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch v3]numa: add a sysctl to control interleave allocation granularity from each node to improve I/O performance
> That's what I want to avoid letting each apps to explicitly do it, it's
> a lot of burden.

Usually apps that set NUMA policy can change it. Most don't anyways.
If it's just a script with numactl it's easily changed.

> That's true only workload with heavy I/O wants this. but I don't expect
> it will harm other workloads.

How do you know?

>
> >> Also I don't like having more per task state. Could you compute this
> >> from the address instead even for the process policy case?
> >
> >That sounds good.
> the process policy case doesn't give an address for allocation.

That's true.

-Andi


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-14 18:55    [W:0.058 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site