lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND] gpio: mpc8xxx: don't allow input-only pins to be output for MPC5121
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:12:48AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Add a 5121-custom reject if an input-only pin is requested to be output
> (see 18.3.1.1 in the refman). Also, rewrite mach-specific quirk setup to
> consume less lines which scales better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> index ec3fcf0..25dc736 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,14 @@ static int mpc8xxx_gpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int mpc5121_gpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
> +{
> + /* GPIO 28..31 are input only on MPC5121 */
> + if (gpio >= 28)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return mpc8xxx_gpio_dir_out(gc, gpio, val);
> +}
> static int mpc8xxx_gpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)

This actually caused a build failure. mpc8xxx_gpio_dir_out() was used before
it was declared. I moved the symbol to immediately below and applied anyway,
but how did it compile for you? Should I drop this patch until you retest?

g.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-13 19:19    [W:0.067 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site