Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 14/17] UAPI: Make linux/patchkey.h easier to parse | Date | Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:57:57 +0000 |
| |
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Is this part missing, or no longer needed? > > It seems to have got lost somewhere. Thanks for catching it.
Actually, it doesn't seem to be necessary. The header splitter managed to cope without it and did the right thing. I think what happened was that the splitter didn't recognise the _LINUX_PATCHKEY_H_INDIRECT thing as a reinclusion guard, so it just tossed that into the UAPI header, then recognised the _LINUX_PATCHKEY_H thing as the reinclusion guard and proceeded from there.
Would you prefer that I remove that from the comments or would you prefer that I leave things unchanged?
David
| |