lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] thp: reduce khugepaged freezing latency
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:53:42AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Andrea, Srivatsa.
>
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 06:15:38PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> > >> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > >> index 4298aba..67311d1 100644
> > >> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > >> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > >> @@ -2277,6 +2277,7 @@ static struct page *khugepaged_alloc_hugepage(void)
> > >> if (!hpage) {
> > >> count_vm_event(THP_COLLAPSE_ALLOC_FAILED);
> > >> khugepaged_alloc_sleep();
> > >> + try_to_freeze();
> > >> } else
> > >> count_vm_event(THP_COLLAPSE_ALLOC);
> > >> } while (unlikely(!hpage) &&
> > >> @@ -2331,7 +2332,7 @@ static int khugepaged(void *none)
> > >> {
> > >> struct mm_slot *mm_slot;
> > >>
> > >> - set_freezable();
> > >> + set_freezable_with_signal();
> > >> set_user_nice(current, 19);
>
> Oooh, please don't do that. It's already gone in the pm tree. It
> would be best if wait_event_freezable_timeout() can be used
> (ie. wakeup condition should be set somewhere) but, if not, something
> like the following sould work.
>
> static void khugepaged_alloc_sleep(void)
> {
> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> add_wait_queue(&khugepaged_wait, &wait);
> try_to_freeze();

XXXXX

> schedule_timeout_interruptible(
> msecs_to_jiffies(
> khugepaged_alloc_sleep_millisecs));
> try_to_freeze();
> remove_wait_queue(&khugepaged_wait, &wait);
> }

I thought about that but isn't there a race condition if TIF_FREEZE is
set just in the point I marked above? I thought the
set_freezable_with_signal by forcing the task runnable would fix it.

How exactly wait_event_freezable_timeout() would avoid the same race
as above? I mean the freezer won't have visibility on the
khugepaged_wait waitqueue head so it surely cannot wake it up. And if
the freezing() check happens before TIF_FREEZE get set but before
schedule() is called, we're still screwed even if I use
wait_event_freezable_timeout()... Or is the signal_pending check
fixing that? But without set_freezable_with_signal() we don't set
TIF_SIGPENDING... so it's not immediately care how this whole logic is
race free. If you use stop_machine that could avoid the races though,
but it doesn't look like the freezer uses that.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-09 17:55    [W:0.049 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site