lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 11/13] powerpc: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and provide seccomp_execve
    From
    On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
    <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
    > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
    >> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:36 -0500, Will Drewry wrote:
    >> > Facilitate the use of CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER by wrapping compatibility
    >> > system call numbering for execve and selecting HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER.
    >> >
    >> > v9: rebase on to bccaeafd7c117acee36e90d37c7e05c19be9e7bf
    >> >
    >> > Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
    >>
    >> Seen these around for a while ... :-)
    >>
    >> I don't see a harm in the patches per-se tho I haven't reviewed the
    >> actual seccomp filter stuff and it's good (or bad) behaviour on ppc.
    >
    > Did that stuff every got anywhere ? I don't see HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER
    > upsteam ... should I just drop the powerpc patch from patchwork ?

    Thanks for following up! At present, it stalled out, so I think it'd
    make sense to just drop it. I will repost the series soon-ish and see
    if any progress can be made. [I've explored a number of alternative
    approaches and still think something along the seccomp_filter lines is
    still rational.]

    cheers!
    will


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-11-28 02:47    [W:3.173 / U:0.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site