lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 3.2-rc2 4/30] uprobes: Define hooks for mmap/munmap.
From
Date
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 19:17 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [2011-11-23 19:10:12]:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 16:37 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > + ret = install_breakpoint(vma->vm_mm, uprobe);
> > > + if (ret == -EEXIST) {
> > > + atomic_inc(&vma->vm_mm->mm_uprobes_count);
> > > + ret = 0;
> > > + }
> >
> > Aren't you double counting that probe position here? The one that raced
> > you to inserting it will also have incremented that counter, no?
> >
>
> No we arent.
> Because register_uprobe can never race with mmap_uprobe and register
> before mmap_uprobe registers .(Once we start mmap_region,
> register_uprobe waits for the read_lock of mmap_sem.)

Still doesn't make any sense. Since you don't increment on success, one
has to assume install_breakpoint() will cause an increment. Therefore,
when we encounter -EEXIST we'll already have accounted for this
mm,inode,offset combination.

But I'll have another look at it, maybe I'm missing something
obvious :-)

> And we badly need this for mmap_uprobe case. Because when we do mremap,
> or vma_adjust(), we do a munmap_uprobe() followed by mmap_uprobe() which
> would have decremented the count but not removed it. So when we do a
> mmap_uprobe, we need to increment the count.

Well I see why the count needs to be correct, that's not the issue.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-24 15:17    [W:0.241 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site