lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] writeback: balanced_rate cannot exceed write bandwidth
On Tue 22-11-11 14:41:49, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 06:50:49AM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 21-11-11 21:03:43, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > Add an upper limit to balanced_rate according to the below inequality.
> > > This filters out some rare but huge singular points, which at least
> > > enables more readable gnuplot figures.
> > >
> > > When there are N dd dirtiers,
> > >
> > > balanced_dirty_ratelimit = write_bw / N
> > >
> > > So it holds that
> > >
> > > balanced_dirty_ratelimit <= write_bw
> > The change makes sense, but do we understand why there are such huge
> > singular points? Are they due to errors in estimation of bandwidth or due
> > to errors in dirtying rate computations (e.g. due to truncates), or
> > something else?
>
> Good point. I'll add this to the changelog:
>
> The singular points originate from dirty_rate in the below formular:
>
> balanced_dirty_ratelimit = task_ratelimit * write_bw / dirty_rate
> where
> dirty_rate = (number of page dirties in the past 200ms) / 200ms
>
> In the extreme case, if all dd tasks suddenly get blocked on something
> else and hence no pages are dirtied at all, dirty_rate will be 0 and
> balanced_dirty_ratelimit will be inf. This could happen in reality.
>
> There won't be tiny singular points though, as long as the dirty pages
> lie inside the dirty control area (above the freerun region).
> Because there the dd tasks will be throttled by balanced_dirty_pages()
> and won't be able to suddenly dirty much more pages than average.
OK, I see. Thanks for explanation.

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-22 22:07    [W:0.068 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site