Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] usb: gadget: drop "select USB_GADGET_S3C_HSOTG_PIO" | From | Paul Bolle <> | Date | Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:47:07 +0100 |
| |
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 11:34 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 10:56 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > I hope I have picked up everything what hasn't been picked up by > > appropriate maintainers (there are still some things in the queue waiting > > for ack, as they might bring dead code into life), please double-check > > that. > > Thanks for handling this. I hope to double check everything within a few > days.
0) All is OK: I've sent you eleven patches in this series. Two were taken by maintainers (drm and unicore32). Nine are now in trivial for-next. Two needed approval (powerpc/4xx and unicore32). powerpc/4xx got acked, and that ack is in your commit and unicore32 got taken by a maintainer.
1) For future series of this kind (if any): does my approach work for you? See, I basically have a list of potential problems that I work on in batches, but one by one. So I'll work on a handful of items on that list, drop the false positives, send a few to maintainers and send the rest to you. After that I quickly go do something else, as this is not the kind of stuff I like to do for hours on end.
2) This means in such a series you'll get batches, a few days apart, of patches each whatever-it-takes apart. Is that more work on your side?
Paul Bolle
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |