Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:49:22 -0200 | From | Glauber Costa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 14/14] Change CPUACCT to default n |
| |
On 11/16/2011 09:52 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:51:27 +0530 > Balbir Singh<bsingharora@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >>> On the other hand, I don't think much discussion remains for cpuacct, >>> everyone's pretty unanimous in that they'd like to see it deprecated. >>> By splitting this up we can close out that quickly while we figure out the >>> best way to resolve the above. >>> >> >> I'd give it a thumbs up, if we can create sched groups and provide >> accounting without control - like we can for the memory cgroup today. >> > > Isn't it possible ? > > Thanks, > -Kame > I must say I don't really understand what exactly you propose, and how it is different from what we have today.
My take is that you are talking about a single cgroup in which you can have the functionality of both cpuacct and cpu, but surrounded by knobs that allows you to turn them off individually.
Am I right?
| |