Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:08:03 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api | From | Jassi Brar <> |
| |
On 7 October 2011 19:49, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 16:57 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> > I would still argue that if we split this on same lines as current >> > mechanism, we have clean way to convey all details for both cases. >> > >> Do you mean to have separate interleaved transfer apis for Slave >> and Mem->Mem ? Please clarify. > If we can make API cleaner and well defined that way then Yes :) > I assume if you suggest you already have an idea.... Please do tell roughly how the api should look for Slave and for Mem->Mem ?
| |