lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 04/30] ARM: omap: add missing __devexit_p() annotations
* Bjarne Steinsbo <bsteinsbo@gmail.com> [111002 08:22]:
> Arnd,
>
> Ref http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg57274.html
>
> Don't get me wrong. This is not about you "stealing" my patch, or
> anything like that. But look also at thread starting at
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg57667.html Also a patch
> that I have posted previously. Something is not right with the
> workflow when bugs are identified, patches are submitted, then
> ignored, only for someone else to fix the same bug. Enough said.

Arnd, I suggest using Bjarne's earlier patch here:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>


> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > Drivers that refer to a __devexit function in an operations
> > structure need to annotate that pointer with __devexit_p so
> > replace it with a NULL pointer when the section gets discarded.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c |    2 +-
> >  arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c          |    2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> > index 34c01a7..67bc6ce 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> > @@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ static int __devexit omap_sr_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  }
> >
> >  static struct platform_driver smartreflex_driver = {
> > -       .remove         = omap_sr_remove,
> > +       .remove         = __devexit_p(omap_sr_remove),
> >        .driver         = {
> >                .name   = "smartreflex",
> >        },
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c
> > index c22217c..f7150ba 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c
> > @@ -2105,7 +2105,7 @@ static int __devexit omap_system_dma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> >  static struct platform_driver omap_system_dma_driver = {
> >        .probe          = omap_system_dma_probe,
> > -       .remove         = omap_system_dma_remove,
> > +       .remove         = __devexit_p(omap_system_dma_remove),
> >        .driver         = {
> >                .name   = "omap_dma_system"
> >        },
> > --
> > 1.7.5.4
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-03 19:51    [W:0.365 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site