Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: RFC : fat : default errors use FAT_ERRORS_CONT instead of FAT_ERRORS_RO. | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | Date | Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:57:41 -0400 |
| |
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:24:52 +0900, NamJae Jeon said:
> It said windows fat provide a chance that continuously access > partition except corrupted file.
It also gives you a chance to make things worse by continuing to write to the device. If you force it RO at the first sign of trouble, maybe you lose a few blocks of one file. If you keep writing to it, creating new files, erasing files, and so on, pretty soon your corrupted filesystem is even more corrupted.
> I suggest that the default errors of linux fat use FAT_ERRORS_CONT > instead of FAT_ERRORS_RO.
And what user benefit does that give? If you keep going, they won't realize their device is corrupted, and won't have any reason to *fix* the filesystem. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |