lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 12/35] workqueue: update cwq alignement
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:

> What alignment maintenance? Are you talking about the UP code? If
> you're talking about the UP code, the ugliness there is because the
> current UP __alloc_percpu() can't honor the alignment parameter.

Why do we need alignment on UP? Cachelines typically dont bounce if a
single processor accesses the data.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-06 16:27    [W:0.168 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site