Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:22:22 -0500 (CDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 12/35] workqueue: update cwq alignement |
| |
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> What alignment maintenance? Are you talking about the UP code? If > you're talking about the UP code, the ugliness there is because the > current UP __alloc_percpu() can't honor the alignment parameter.
Why do we need alignment on UP? Cachelines typically dont bounce if a single processor accesses the data.
| |