Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:39:32 +0200 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: implement and use WQ_UNBOUND |
| |
Hello,
On 07/07/2010 07:41 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 07/02/2010 11:17 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Arjan, I still think we'll be better off using bound workqueues for >> async but let's first convert without causing behavior difference. >> Either way isn't gonna result in any noticeable difference anyway. If >> you're okay with the conversion, please ack it. > > Ping, Arjan.
Just for the record, I pinged Arjan again offlist and Arjan acked the conversion in the reply. Added Acked-by and pushed the conversion to for-next-candidate which will be pushed into linux-next the next week.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |