Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:43:42 -0700 (PDT) | From | Dan Magenheimer <> | Subject | RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen |
| |
Hi Stefano --
What versions of Xen are compatible with this series? I.e. is 4.0 required? Are all Xen-side changes in official 4.0.0? Or only in 4.0-testing (and therefore will be in 4.0.1)? Or only in xen-unstable?
If post-4.0.0 xen changes are necessary, could you point out the changesets?
Thanks, Dan
P.S. Sorry if I missed earlier discussion or documentation on this... but if not otherwise documented, maybe the info should be in the patch comment?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 5:39 AM > To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Cc: Fitzhardinge; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com; > Jeremy@acsinet12.oracle.com; Stefano Stabellini; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Don Dutile; Sheng Yang > Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:12:20PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > this is another update on the PV on HVM Xen series; a list of > changes > > > compared to the previous version follows: > > > > Can you use the [v4] in the main patch (this is the fourth version of > > these patches, right?)? I am getting confused as to which version I > am > > reviewing and if I've missed one or what not. > > > > And in this first intro email state: > > > > Since v7 the following things have changed: > > - Konrad made some comments. > > - etc. > > > > Good point, I'll do that from now on. > I am pretty sure that you are reviewing the latest version I sent. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| |