lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v21 011/100] eclone (11/11): Document sys_eclone
On 06/09/2010 11:14 AM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> |
> | Even for x86, it's an easier API. Callers would be specifying
> | two numbers they already have: the argument and return value
> | for malloc. Currently the numbers must be added together,
> | destroying information, except on hppa (must not add size)
> | and ia64 (must use what I'm proposing already).
>
> I agree its easier and would avoid #ifdefs in the applications.
>
> Peter, Arnd, Roland - do you have any concerns with requiring all
> architectures to specify the stack to eclone() as [base, offset]
>

Makes sense to me. There might be advantages to be able to track the
size of the "stack allocation" even for other architectures, too.

-hpa


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-09 20:49    [W:0.081 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site