Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:17:05 -0400 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1]460EX on-chip SATA driver<resubmisison> |
| |
On 06/30/2010 02:47 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Rupjyoti Sarmah, > > In message<3b928476b2fffdcf0694e5436e8a482f@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: >> >> I took the mainline kernel v2.6.35-rc3 and downloaded using the git >> download link. >> I created the patch on 6/24/2010 after doing a git pull. > > I don;t think that you used v2.6.35-rc3; using this version, I still > get this: > > drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c:43:1: warning: "DRV_NAME" redefined > In file included from drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c:38: > drivers/ata/libata.h:31:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c:44:1: warning: "DRV_VERSION" redefined > drivers/ata/libata.h:32:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c: In function 'sata_dwc_scr_read': > drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c:777: error: 'struct ata_port' has no member named 'ioaddr' > drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c: In function 'sata_dwc_scr_write': > drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c:793: error: 'struct ata_port' has no member named 'ioaddr' > drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c: In function 'sata_dwc_error_intr': > drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c:844: error: 'struct ata_port_operations' has no member named 'sff_check_status'
It looks like -your- build config is missing CONFIG_ATA_SFF or similar.
If you actually look at include/linux/libata.h, you see that struct ata_port_operations most definitely has a member named sff_check_status, for example. Ditto ata_port and member ioaddr, etc.
Jeff
| |