lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] block/io bits for 2.6.35-rc
    From
    On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> wrote:
    >
    > - A set of patches fixing the WB_SYNC_NONE writeback from Christoph. So
    >  we should finally have both functional and working WB_SYNC_NONE from
    >  umount context.

    I _really_ think this is too late, considering how broken it has been.
    We already reverted the WB_SYNC_NONE things exactly because it didn't
    work, didn't we? I'm going to be off-line in two days, and this part
    of the pull request really makes me nervous, if only simply because of
    the history of it all (ie it's always been broken, why shouldn't it be
    broken now?).

    IOW, that's a lot of scary changes, that have historically not been
    safe or sufficiently tested, and have caused problems for various
    filesystems. Convince me why they should suddenly be ok to merge?

    Linus
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-06-10 17:59    [W:6.682 / U:0.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site