Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:29:00 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/development-process: add info on maintainers |
| |
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:26:36 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:17:05 -0700 > Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote: > > > +- Please note that most maintainers also have day jobs, so merging > > + your patch may not be their highest priority. If your patch is > > + getting feedback about changes that are needed, you should either > > + make those changes or justify why they should not be made. If your > > + patch has no review complaints but is not being merged by its > > + appropriate subsystem or driver maintainer, you should be persistent > > + in updating the patch to the current kernel so that it applies cleanly > > + and keep sending it for review & merging. > > I'd prefer to spell out "and" in that last line, being the sort of > person that I am. Either way: > > Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
OK, I'll change that. Thanks for looking.
--- ~Randy
| |