Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:07:39 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] intel-agp.c: Fix crash when accessing nonexistent GTT entries in i915 | From | Miguel Ojeda <> |
| |
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:06:21 +0200 > Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Andrew Morton >> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:55:56 +0100 >> > Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Andrew Morton >> >> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:40:05 +0100 >> >> > Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> wrote: >> >> >> > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 at 20:57, Andrew Morton wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:30:20 +0100 Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I bisected in order to find the commit 5877960869333e42ebeb733e8d9d5630ff96d350. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I believe this[0] is fc61901373987ad61851ed001fe971f3ee8d96a3 upstream: >> >> >> >> >> >> Indeed. Also in >> >> >> >> >> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git;a=commit;h=fc61901373987ad61851ed001fe971f3ee8d96a3 >> >> > >> >> > Does reverting that patch from the current code fix the crash? >> >> >> >> Yes. In addition, applying the patch I provided also fixes it in current code. >> >> >> > >> > Well great. __A whole pile of new stuff has turned up in linux-next's >> > drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c. __As far as I can tell none of it >> > address the regression which you've reported and your patch no longer >> > applies at all so I have to drop the patch. >> > >> > Perhaps "agp/intel: put back check that we have a driver for the >> > bridge" fixes it, but it isn't tagged for -stable backporting. >> >> I can try linux-next and see if it works again. > > Thanks. > >> In addition, I have to test the regression with some newer X version >> yet, as Zhenyu told me. > > That would seem to be counter-productive. If you install a newer X and > the bug goes away, you've just gone and made it harder for yourself to > reproduce the bug. >
Oh, of course. I meant compiling the latest version somewhere and have both versions ready (the Debian's one and the one from x.org). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |