Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:41:35 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/10] bkl: pushdowns from Arnd, and compile fixes | From | Frederic Weisbecker <> |
| |
2010/4/27 John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>: > > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Tuesday 27 April 2010, John Kacur wrote: >> > These are bkl pushdowns from Arnd that conflicted with >> > Linus's "Preparation for BKL'ed ioctl removal patch". I fixed-up the merge >> > conflicts. In addition - during allyesconfig compile testing on x86_64 I found >> > a number of issues that I fixed-up >> >> Thanks for catching the scsi bugs! It was getting late yesterday night, so >> I didn't go through a full allyesconfig then. >> >> > I pushed these to my own new linus-bkl tree. >> > git://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkacur/jk-2.6.git linux-bkl >> > >> > Frederic, if you want to grab those, pls do so. also, we might want to combine >> > my compile fixes with Arnd's push-down patches, for better git bisectability. >> >> Yes, your fixes (except the v4l2 patch, see comment there) should best be >> merged into the main patches. >> >> The idea was that if we manage to kill all fops->ioctl users right away, >> we wouldn't even need Linus' patch and move to dungeon level 2 directly. >> Either way works for me though. >> >> Should we just split up the rest? If you, Frederic and me each take one >> of these chunks, we're done. According to the diffstat from Linus' patch, >> this is what's left: > > Okay - good plan. I AM trying to balance doing my own day-to-day work, > and writing slides for a conference but I'm sure you and Frederic are > just as pressed for time as me, so lets go-ahead and divide it up! > That will prevent us from doing redundant work. > I assume the target is 2.6.35 so, we have a little bit of time anyway. > > I suggest we divide up a) and b) first and postone c) until the first > parts are done. > > Arranging our names by alphabetical order and shuffling the files > off one at a time (for variety), I get this. Is everybody happy with that? > 36 files / 3 = 12 files each. > Jan - speak up if you want in. > > Arnd > ---- > arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/ds1302.c > arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/pcf8563.c > arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/i2c.c > arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/pcf8563.c > arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/sn_hwperf.c > arch/m68k/mvme16x/rtc.c > arch/um/drivers/mmapper_kern.c > fs/coda/psdev.c > fs/hfsplus/dir.c > fs/logfs/file.c > fs/ntfs/dir.c > fs/smbfs/file.c > > Frederic > -------- > arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/gpio.c > arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/sync_serial.c > arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/mach-a3/gpio.c > arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/sync_serial.c > arch/m68k/bvme6000/rtc.c > arch/um/drivers/harddog_kern.c > fs/autofs/root.c > fs/fat/dir.c > fs/hfsplus/inode.c > fs/ncpfs/dir.c > fs/ntfs/file.c > fs/udf/dir.c
Ok :)
| |