Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | "Madhusudhan" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v4] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's peformance. | Date | Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:26:00 -0500 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: kishore kadiyala [mailto:kishorek.kadiyala@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 10:52 AM > To: Madhusudhan > Cc: Nishanth Menon; felipe.balbi@nokia.com; me@felipebalbi.com; Vimal > Singh; tony@atomide.com; S, Venkatraman; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Lavinen Jarkko (Nokia-D/Helsinki) > Subject: [PATCH v4] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's > peformance. > > The previous patch was Line wrapped , resending > correct patch. > NM, Sorry I miss spelled your name correcting this time. > > Regards, > Kishore >
Tony,
I don't see any further comments on this patch. Can you please push this patch?
Regards, Madhu
> From: Kishore Kadiyala <kishore.kadiyala@ti.com> > > This patch improves low speeds for SD cards. > OMAP-MMC controller's can support maximum bus width of '8'. > when bus width is mentioned as "8" in controller data,the SD > stack will check whether bus width is "4" and if not it will > set bus width to "1" and there by degrading performance. > This patch fixes the issue and improves the performance of > SD cards. > > Signed-off-by: Kishore Kadiyala <kishore.kadiyala@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> > Acked-by: Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@ti.com> > Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula <jhnikula@gmail.com> > --- > In V4 : Updated with Nishant's comments and appened his Signed-off > In V3 : Updated with Madhu's comments and appended Tested by Nikula > In V2 : Appended Signed-off by Venkat and Ack by Madhu > > Here are my experiment numbers, on a Class 6 SDHC card: > Read peformance is increased by 220% > Write Performance is increased by 52% > > drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > index 8c97c22..9c1a60e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c > @@ -2091,10 +2091,23 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struct > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED | > MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY; > > - if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 8) > - mmc->caps |= (MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA); > - else if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 4) > + switch (mmc_slot(host).wires) { > + case 8: > + mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA; > + /* Fall through */ > + case 4: > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA; > + break; > + case 1: > + /* Nothing to crib here */ > + case 0: > + /* Assuming nothing was given by board, Core use's 1-Bit */ > + break; > + default: > + /* Completely unexpected.. Core goes with 1-Bit Width */ > + dev_crit(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "Invalid width %d\n used!" > + "using 1 instead\n", mmc_slot(host).wires); > + } > > if (mmc_slot(host).nonremovable) > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE; > -- > 1.6.3.3
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |