Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: pci_get_dev_by_id() from interrupt handlers | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:21:11 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 12:05 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > Why not do the whole thing in an interrupt task as the whole thing > > sounds like something that shouldn't be done in interrupt context, > > right? Now that we have this type of functionality, we should take > > advantage of it :) > > Ok, I think I move the IOMMU interrupt handling to a tasklet. > tasklet is softirq context, and is not what gregkh was talking about.
You'd still need to change the klist spinlock to be softirq-safe.
| |