Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/16] rcu: fix now-bogus rcu_scheduler_active comments. | Date | Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:13:29 -0700 |
| |
The rcu_scheduler_active check has been wrapped into the new debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() function, so update the comments to reflect this new reality.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 6 ++++-- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index 91a5473..804ce3e 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ static inline int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void) * this assumes we are in an RCU read-side critical section unless it can * prove otherwise. * - * Check rcu_scheduler_active to prevent false positives during boot. + * Check debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() to prevent false positives during boot + * and while lockdep is disabled. */ static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void) { @@ -139,7 +140,8 @@ extern int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void); * of preemption (including disabling irqs) counts as an RCU-sched * read-side critical section. * - * Check rcu_scheduler_active to prevent false positives during boot. + * Check debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() to prevent false positives during boot + * and while lockdep is disabled. */ #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void) -- 1.7.0
| |