lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Downsides to madvise/fadvise(willneed) for application startup
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 19:27, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> Yes, every binary/library starts with this 512b read.  It is requested
> by ld.so/ld-linux.so, and will trigger a 4-page readahead. This is not
> good readahead. I wonder if ld.so can switch to mmap read for the
> first read, in order to trigger a larger 128kb readahead.

We first need to know the sizes of the segments and their location in the binary. The binaries we use now are somewhat well laid out. The read-only segment starts at offset 0 etc. But this doesn't have to be the case. The dynamic linker has to be generic. Also, even if we start mapping at offset zero, now much to map? The file might contain debug info which must not be mapped. Therefore the first read loads enough of the headers to make all of the decisions. Yes, we could do a mmap of one page instead of the read. But that's more expansive in general, isn't it?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-12 06:45    [W:0.066 / U:0.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site