lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] cpuhotplug: make get_online_cpus() scalability by using percpu counter
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 04/07, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>> Old get_online_cpus() is read-preference, I think the goal of this ability
>>> is allow get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus() to be called nested.
>> Sure, I understand why you added task_struct->get_online_cpus_nest.
>>
>>> and use per-task counter for allowing get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus()
>>> to be called nested, I think this deal is absolutely worth.
>> As I said, I am not going to argue. I can't justify this tradeoff.
>
> But, I must admit, I'd like to avoid adding the new member to task_struct.
>
> What do you think about the code below?
>
> I didn't even try to compile it, just to explain what I mean.
>
> In short: we have the per-cpu fast counters, plus the slow counter
> which is only used when cpu_hotplug_begin() is in progress.
>
> Oleg.
>

get_online_cpus() in your code is still read-preference.
I wish we quit this ability of get_online_cpus().

Lai.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-12 11:27    [W:0.085 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site