lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM: Hide OPP configuration when SoCs do not provide an implementation
Date
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> writes:

> Since the OPP API is only useful with an appropraite SoC-specific
> implementation there is no point in offering the ability to enable
> the API on general systems. Provide an ARCH_HAS OPP Kconfig symbol
> which masks out the option unless selected by an implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>

> ---
> Documentation/power/opp.txt | 3 +++
> kernel/power/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/power/opp.txt b/Documentation/power/opp.txt
> index 44d87ad..cd44558 100644
> --- a/Documentation/power/opp.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/power/opp.txt
> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ Typical usage of the OPP library is as follows:
> SoC framework -> modifies on required cases certain OPPs -> OPP layer
> -> queries to search/retrieve information ->
>
> +Architectures that provide a SoC framework for OPP should select ARCH_HAS_OPP
> +to make the OPP layer available.
> +
> OPP layer expects each domain to be represented by a unique device pointer. SoC
> framework registers a set of initial OPPs per device with the OPP layer. This
> list is expected to be an optimally small number typically around 5 per device.
> diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> index 29bff61..a5aff3e 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> @@ -246,9 +246,13 @@ config PM_OPS
> depends on PM_SLEEP || PM_RUNTIME
> default y
>
> +config ARCH_HAS_OPP
> + bool
> +
> config PM_OPP
> bool "Operating Performance Point (OPP) Layer library"
> depends on PM
> + depends on ARCH_HAS_OPP
> ---help---
> SOCs have a standard set of tuples consisting of frequency and
> voltage pairs that the device will support per voltage domain. This


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-09 20:21    [W:0.074 / U:3.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site