Re: [PATCH] x86: fix apic.h unused but set warnings
> At least the former code _didn't_ hide the details of which > part of 'long long' value we need. Would not > > u64 val; > rdmsrl(APIC_BASE_MSR + (reg >> 4), val); > return (u32)val; > > be more clear?
Maybe, but I doubt it will make much difference either way.
-Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.