Re: [PATCH 1/2] locks: let the caller free file_lock on ->setlease failure
> A minor oversight from f7347ce4ee7c65415f84be915c018473e7076f31, > "fasync: re-organize fasync entry insertion to allow it under a > spinlock": this cleanup-on-error was only needed to handle -ENOMEM. Now > that we're preallocating it's unneeded.