Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Nov 2010 20:34:44 +0000 | Subject | Re: your patch "x86, olpc: Rework BIOS signature check" | From | Daniel Drake <> |
| |
Hi Jan,
On 26 November 2010 13:18, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote: > ... adds a select of OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE to the OLPC option, > which contradicts OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE itself depending on > !X86_64 && !X86_PAE. Are the latter dependencies not necessary > anymore (the X86_64 one wasn't very meaningful anyway, since > these options all sit inside a "if X86_32"), or should the select be > conditional? > > Also, how meaningful is having OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE on but OLPC > off (i.e. can OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE perhaps go away altogether)?
Yeah, having reached this point we think OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE should be merged into CONFIG_OLPC. I'll submit a patch soon.
Daniel
| |