Messages in this thread Patch in this message | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:39:54 +0100 | From | Marc Kleine-Budde <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 16/17 v3] can: EG20T PCH: Fix incorrect return processing |
| |
On 11/24/2010 01:24 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote: > Fix incorrect return processing
see comments inline
> Signed-off-by: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@dsn.okisemi.com> > --- > drivers/net/can/pch_can.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c > index c612a99..48f4a2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c > +++ b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c > @@ -589,10 +589,12 @@ static irqreturn_t pch_can_interrupt(int irq, void > *dev_id) > struct net_device *ndev = (struct net_device *)dev_id; > struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); > > - pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_NONE); > - napi_schedule(&priv->napi); > - > - return IRQ_HANDLED; > + if ((pch_can_int_pending(priv) > 0) && (dev_id != NULL)) { > + pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_NONE); > + napi_schedule(&priv->napi); > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > + } > + return IRQ_NONE;
My comment from the first review still applied here:
dev_id is always != NULL, because you registered your IRQ handler with it. (BTW: dev_id has already been dereferenced in netdev_priv(), so if this code is executed, dev_if is != NULL)
Just write:
if (!pch_can_int_pending(priv)) return IRQ_NONE;
> } > > static void pch_fifo_thresh(struct pch_can_priv *priv, int obj_id) > @@ -674,7 +676,7 @@ static int pch_can_rx_normal(struct net_device > *ndev, u32 obj_num, int quota) > if (reg & PCH_IF_MCONT_MSGLOST) { > rtn = pch_can_rx_msg_lost(ndev, obj_num); > if (!rtn) > - return rtn; > + return rcv_pkts; > rcv_pkts++; > quota--; > obj_num++; > @@ -777,10 +779,12 @@ static int pch_can_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, > int quota) > goto end; > > if ((int_stat >= PCH_RX_OBJ_START) && (int_stat <= PCH_RX_OBJ_END)) { > - rcv_pkts += pch_can_rx_normal(ndev, int_stat, quota); > - quota -= rcv_pkts; > - if (quota < 0) > + rcv_pkts = pch_can_rx_normal(ndev, int_stat, quota); > + if (rcv_pkts < 0) { > + rcv_pkts = 0; > goto end; > + } > + quota -= rcv_pkts;
you introduced the problem in patch "[PATCH net-next-2.6 6/17 v3] can: EG20T PCH: Fix endianness issue", please don't do this in the first place.
( This is an example why you should split your patches and give them proper subject.)
> } else if ((int_stat >= PCH_TX_OBJ_START) && > (int_stat <= PCH_TX_OBJ_END)) { > /* Handle transmission interrupt */
cheers, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |