lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 1/2] x86: add numa=possible command line option
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:46:07PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Américo Wang wrote:
>> Also, numa=possible= is not as clear as numa=max=, for me at least.
>>
>
>I like name, but it requires that you know how many nodes that system
>already has. In other words, numa=possible=4 allows you to specify that 4
>additional nodes will be possible, but initially offline, for this or
>other purposes. numa=max=4 would be no-op if the system actually had 4
>nodes.
>
>I chose numa=possible over numa=additional because it is more clearly tied
>to node_possible_map, which is the only thing it modifies.

Okay, I thought "possible" means "max", but "possible" means "addtional" here.
It's clear for me now.

Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-22 16:43    [W:0.104 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site