Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:35:59 -0800 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups |
| |
On 11/16/2010 12:05 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 16.11.10 19:08, Peter Zijlstra (a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl) wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 18:03 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> Binding something like this to TTYs is just backwards. No graphical >>> session has a TTY attached anymore. And there might be multiple TTYs >>> used in the same session. >> >> Using a group per tty makes sense for us console jockeys.. > > Well, then maybe you shouldn't claim this was relevant for anybody but > yourself. Because it is irrelevant for most users if it is bound to the TTY. >
For what it's worth, I suspect that the object that should be bound to is probably not the tty, but rather the session ID of the process (which generally is 1:1 with controlling TTY for console processes.)
-hpa
| |