lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [V2 PATCH 0/6] x86, NMI: give NMI handler a face-lift
From
Date
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 06:47 -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> More specifically
> when another subsystem injects an NMI event the perf NMI code returns
> NOTIFY_STOP.

Not unconditionally, right? We only do so when the previous NMI was from
the PMU and nobody claimed this one (NOTIFY_STOP from DIE_NMIUNKNOWN).

Or are you hitting the other one, where !handled but pmu_nmi.handled >
1 ?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-18 14:19    [W:0.069 / U:0.764 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site