lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] [PATCH 1/5] events: Add EVENT_FS the event filesystem
* Ted Ts'o (tytso@mit.edu) wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:52:34PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > I still say no to stable tracepoints in modules. Once you open that
> > door, everyone will have it.
>
> What about having KVM define the stable tracepoints in the built-in
> part of the kernel, if CONFIG_KVM is Y or M, and then export the
> tracepoints, such that the tracepoints can be called from a module?
>
> That way the tracepoints aren't being *defined* in a module, they are
> just being *called* from the module. Does that seem like a reasonable
> compromise?

As Avi replied separately, he does not seem to think stable ABI is needed for
KVM, given that his tools can deal with tracepoint addition/removal pretty well.
However, let's keep this idea in mind if we ever face this issue with other
"core" modules.

Thanks Ted,

Mathieu

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-18 14:07    [W:0.074 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site