Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Bart Van Assche <> | Date | Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:53:20 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 8/19]: SCST SYSFS interface implementation |
| |
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote: > [ ... ] > This is quite unfortunate as I still have not seen the public comparison > of the 2 implementations and the lists of benefits and shortfalls for > both of them.
The reason why we are proposing SCST for upstream inclusion are: - It has a large user base. - The project is known for its high performance, low latency I/O and excellent stability. - A feature-wise overview can be found here: http://scst.sourceforge.net/comparison.html.
Bart.
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |