lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [PATCH 3/4][v2] fsl_rio: move machine_check handler into machine_check_e500 & machine_check_e500mc
Date
From
Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > [Xie Shaohui-B21989] Hi Alex, seems your suggestion is some kind of
> > conflict with Kumar, you can have a look at
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/67774/
>
> I think Alex's comment is the fact we ignore the 'return' value in the
machine_check_e500 case.

Yes, this one and plus the fact that Mchk exception messages are printed
even if it was handled successfully (by RIO handler). Messages are
printed in both: e500 and e500mc handlers.

Alex.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-11 14:43    [W:1.541 / U:0.792 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site