Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [PATCH 3/4][v2] fsl_rio: move machine_check handler into machine_check_e500 & machine_check_e500mc | Date | Thu, 11 Nov 2010 05:40:04 -0800 | From | "Bounine, Alexandre" <> |
| |
Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > [Xie Shaohui-B21989] Hi Alex, seems your suggestion is some kind of > > conflict with Kumar, you can have a look at > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/67774/ > > I think Alex's comment is the fact we ignore the 'return' value in the machine_check_e500 case.
Yes, this one and plus the fact that Mchk exception messages are printed even if it was handled successfully (by RIO handler). Messages are printed in both: e500 and e500mc handlers.
Alex.
| |