Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:52:55 +0530 | From | Balbir Singh <> | Subject | Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests |
| |
* Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@valinux.co.jp> [2009-09-08 12:01:19]:
> I think there are some advantages to dm-ioband. That's why I post > dm-ioband to the mailing list. > > - dm-ioband supports not only proportional weight policy but also rate > limiting policy. Besides, new policies can be added to dm-ioband if > a user wants to control bandwidth by his or her own policy. > - The dm-ioband driver can be replaced without stopping the system by > using device-mapper's facility. It's easy to maintain. > - dm-ioband can use without cgroup. (I remember Vivek said it's not an > advantage.)
But don't you need page_cgroup for IO tracking?
-- Balbir
| |