lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Regarding dm-ioband tests
    * Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@valinux.co.jp> [2009-09-08 12:01:19]:

    > I think there are some advantages to dm-ioband. That's why I post
    > dm-ioband to the mailing list.
    >
    > - dm-ioband supports not only proportional weight policy but also rate
    > limiting policy. Besides, new policies can be added to dm-ioband if
    > a user wants to control bandwidth by his or her own policy.
    > - The dm-ioband driver can be replaced without stopping the system by
    > using device-mapper's facility. It's easy to maintain.
    > - dm-ioband can use without cgroup. (I remember Vivek said it's not an
    > advantage.)

    But don't you need page_cgroup for IO tracking?

    --
    Balbir


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-09-08 05:25    [W:4.404 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site