lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
On Mon, Sep 07 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > Agree, I was actually looking into doing joint latency for X
> > number of tasks for the test app. I'll try and do that and see if
> > we can detect something from that.
>
> Could you please try latest -tip:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
>
> (c26f010 or later)
>
> Does it get any better with make -j128 build jobs? Peter just fixed

The compile 'problem' is on my workstation, which is a dual core Intel
core 2. I use -j4 on that typically. On the bigger boxes, I don't notice
any interactivity problems, largely because I don't run anything latency
sensitive on those :-)

> a bug in the SMP load-balancer that can cause interactivity problems
> on large CPU count systems.

Worth trying on the dual core box?

--
Jens Axboe



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-07 22:49    [W:0.509 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site