Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [quad core results] BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements | From | Xavier Bestel <> | Date | Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:24:29 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 07:45 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:41:51 +0300 > > >It shows similar curves and behavior to the 8-core results i posted > > >- BFS is slower than mainline in virtually every measurement. The > > >ratios are different for different parts of the graphs - but the > > >trend is similar. > > > > Dude, not cool. > > > > 1. Quad HT is not the same as a 4-core desktop, you're doing it with > > 8 cores > > 4 cores, 8 threads. Which is basically the standard desktop cpu going > forward... (4 cores already is today, 8 threads is that any day now)
Except on your typical smartphone, which will run linux and probably vastly outnumber the number of "traditional" linux desktops.
Xav
| |