Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:04:19 GMT | From | tip-bot for Ian Schram <> | Subject | [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: Fix perf_copy_attr() pointer arithmetic |
| |
Commit-ID: cdf8073d6b2c6c5a3cd6ce0e6c1297157f7f99ba Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/cdf8073d6b2c6c5a3cd6ce0e6c1297157f7f99ba Author: Ian Schram <ischram@telenet.be> AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:26:26 +0200 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> CommitDate: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:32:55 +0200
perf_counter: Fix perf_copy_attr() pointer arithmetic
There is still some weird code in per_copy_attr(). Which supposedly checks that all bytes trailing a struct are zero.
It doesn't seem to get pointer arithmetic right. Since it increments an iterating pointer by sizeof(unsigned long) rather than 1.
Signed-off-by: Ian Schram <ischram@telenet.be> [ v2: clean up the messy PTR_ALIGN logic as well. ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # for v2.6.31.x LKML-Reference: <4AB3DEE2.3030600@telenet.be> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
--- kernel/perf_counter.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/perf_counter.c b/kernel/perf_counter.c index d5899b6..cc768ab 100644 --- a/kernel/perf_counter.c +++ b/kernel/perf_counter.c @@ -4208,8 +4208,8 @@ done: static int perf_copy_attr(struct perf_counter_attr __user *uattr, struct perf_counter_attr *attr) { - int ret; u32 size; + int ret; if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uattr, PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER0)) return -EFAULT; @@ -4234,19 +4234,19 @@ static int perf_copy_attr(struct perf_counter_attr __user *uattr, /* * If we're handed a bigger struct than we know of, - * ensure all the unknown bits are 0. + * ensure all the unknown bits are 0 - i.e. new + * user-space does not rely on any kernel feature + * extensions we dont know about yet. */ if (size > sizeof(*attr)) { - unsigned long val; - unsigned long __user *addr; - unsigned long __user *end; + unsigned char __user *addr; + unsigned char __user *end; + unsigned char val; - addr = PTR_ALIGN((void __user *)uattr + sizeof(*attr), - sizeof(unsigned long)); - end = PTR_ALIGN((void __user *)uattr + size, - sizeof(unsigned long)); + addr = (void __user *)uattr + sizeof(*attr); + end = (void __user *)uattr + size; - for (; addr < end; addr += sizeof(unsigned long)) { + for (; addr < end; addr++) { ret = get_user(val, addr); if (ret) return ret;
| |