Messages in this thread | | | From | Corentin Chary <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] rfkill_unregister() should always be followed by rfkill_destroy() | Date | Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:47:22 +0200 |
| |
On Monday 14 September 2009 19:10:56 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > I don't know about the fix for dell-laptop since it is a lot larger. > > But looking at it, it seems to meet the -stable criteria as well. However, > it looks like you're fixing two bugs there (set pointers to NULL, call > _destroy()), so it would be better to have two (smaller) patches, maybe? >
The dell-laptop patch is superseded by: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/42705/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/42699/
I didn't check patchwork before working on this patch :/
-- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net
| |