Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:40:01 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: " to ARM sections |
| |
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:18:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 16:03 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:23:34AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 14:33 +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:02:10AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > I suspect a vger based ARM list would not require you to "run" it. > > > > There is already a vger based ARM list. I see no signs of people > > > > moving over to it. I summise that is because most people don't > > > > have a problem, and most people are happy with the existing lists > > > > as they stand. Could it be that it's only a minority who are > > > > having issues. I don't know. > > > > > > Perhaps there is too little exposure of the > > > linux-arm@vger.kernel.org mailing list. > > > > I'm not subscribed, please do not add any of the samsung entries > > with linux-arm@vger.kernel.org list. > > Perhaps this patch is more palatable. It's certainly shorter. > > It does add both linux-arm-kernel and linux-arm to section > SIMTEC EB2410ITX (BAST). By the way, another section you > maintain, SIMTEC EB110ATX (Chalice CATS), has neither a > pattern entry nor a mailing list entry. Should it?
I recently had to remove those pattern entries because they were plainly wrong (thanks to those who didn't CC anyone in the ARM community with those patches.) EB110ATX != EBSA110. See ce53895.
I had asked the maintainer of that platform to submit a patch to add the correct entries. Rather than having plainly bogus entries in there, let's have either nothing or the right entries.
-- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of:
| |