Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: RFC: THE OFFLINE SCHEDULER | From | (Frank Ch. Eigler) | Date | Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:55:17 -0400 |
| |
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:
> [...] > >> Don't get all religious about this. If the change is clean, >> maintainable and useful then there's no reason to not merge it.
> Precisely. This feature as proposed here hinders the correct > solution being implemented - and hence hurts long term > maintainability and hence is a no-merge right now.
(Does it "hinder" this in any different way than the following, as in possibly reducing "pressure" for it?)
> [It also weakens the pressure to fix latencies for a much wider set > of applications, hence hurts the quality of Linux in the long > run. (i.e. is a net step backwards)]
How would you differentiate the above sentiment from "perfect is the enemy of the good"?
- FChE
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |