Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:03:03 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Increase granularity of read_persistent_clock() |
| |
* Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:50:17PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > [...] It's like making changes inside #ifdef CONFIG_FOO but never > > > testing with CONFIG_FOO turned on. You'd complain, and rightly, > > > if someone did that. > > > > You again seem to ignore the very valid case i pointed out: if i > > change generic code (or an include, an inline function or a > > define) which somehow affects an architecture, by your logic i'd > > be compelled to test it on that architecture - because it > > affects it. That's not reasonable overhead. > > Paul, Ingo, it seems like the two of you are talking past each > other. He's said he's OK with generic code which somehow affects > an architecture only being tested on one architecture, so what > you're proposing is a straw man. What he has requested it would > be nice that each line of code be compile-tested on at least *one* > architecture. If it's generic code, then by definition when you > compile on x86, it's met the criterion he has proposed. > > On the other hand, your claim that it would slow down development > too much is based on the assumption that if you make a change in > generic code that breaks architecture-specific code, it's good > manners to at least *attempt* to fix up the architecture-specific > code, as opposed to leaving it broken. [...]
That's (of course!) what happened here.
In fact, more than just an attempt happened, the thread started by _me_ finding this build breakage to begin with:
> > > FYI, -tip arch-testing found that this commit broke the PowerPC > > > build: > > > > > > /home/mingo/tip/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c: In function 'read_persistent_clock': > > > /home/mingo/tip/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:788: error: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
and i applied the fix from Martin very quickly as well.
So i think this is much ado about nothing. Testing was done, the fix was applied immediately and no kitten was hurt in the process.
Ingo
| |